Ex Parte Clemens - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                             
                                    is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                              ________________                                                   
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                              ________________                                                   
                                         Ex parte DAVID CLEMENS                                                  
                                              ________________                                                   
                                              Appeal 2007-0102                                                   
                                            Application 10/338,988                                               
                                           Technology Center 3700                                                
                                              ________________                                                   
                                            Decided:  June 1, 2007                                               
                                              ________________                                                   
                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                                 
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
                GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       We AFFIRM.                                                                                
                       This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the final                      
                rejection of claims 1, 3, 5-8, 10, 12-17, 19, and 21-23.  We have jurisdiction                   
                under 35 U.S.C.  6.                                                                             
                       The Appellant claims a radiator element and a method for the                              
                manufacture thereof.  The radiator element comprises a lamella element 28                        

                                                                                                                



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013