1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte KI-OOK PARK, IN-EUNG KIM
12 IN-SEOP JEONG and TAE-SEOK PARK
13 ____________________
14
15 Appeal 2007-0112
16 Reissue Application 09/892,7901
17 Patent 5,917,679
18 Technology Center 2600
19 ____________________
20
21 Oral Argument: None2
22 Decided: February 12, 2007
23 ____________________
24
25 Before: FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
26 HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP and ALLEN R. MacDONALD,
27 Administrative Patent Judges.
28
29 McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
30
1 Reissue application filed 28 June 2001 seeking to reissue U.S. Patent
5,917,679, granted 29 June 1999, based on application 08/915,342 filed
22 August 1997. The real party in interest is SamSung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2 Oral argument was scheduled for 21 February 2007. In preparing for oral
argument, it became apparent that further action by the Examiner was
required. Accordingly, oral argument was cancelled, counsel for Appellants
being notified by phone 6 February 2007 of the cancellation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013