Ex Parte Paul et al - Page 2



                Appeal 2007-0124                                                                                 
                Application 10/273,836                                                                           

                pending in this application (Br. 1, 3; Answer 2).1  We have jurisdiction                         
                pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                                     
                       According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a low application                   
                temperature hot melt adhesive comprising a styrene block copolymer in an                         
                amount from about 10 to about 25 weight % and a wax in an amount of less                         
                than 10 weight % such as to produce the claimed properties of viscosity,                         
                cube flow, DSC crystallization temperature, and storage modulus (Br. 2-3).                       
                Illustrative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                            
                1.  A low application temperature hot melt adhesive comprising a styrene                         
                block copolymer and a wax in an amount effective to produce a viscosity at                       
                120°C of below about 10,000 centipoises, a cube flow at 54°C of less than                        
                about 300%, a DSC crystallization temperature of less than about 75°C, and                       
                a storage modulus of less than about 1.0 x 107 dynes/cm2 at 10 rads/sec                          
                (25°C), wherein the styrene block copolymer is present in amounts of from                        
                about 10 to about 25 wt % and said effective amount of wax is less than                          
                10 wt %.                                                                                         
                       The Examiner relies on the following reference:                                           
                Ryan  US 5,387,623 Feb. 7, 1995                                                                  
                       The Examiner has relied on Ryan, US 5,387,623, issued Feb. 7, 1995,                       
                as the sole evidence in support of unpatentability of the appealed claims                        
                (Answer 3, ¶ (8)).  Appellants rely on Malcolm, US 5,024,667, issued                             


                                                                                                                
                1 As correctly noted by the Examiner (Answer 2, ¶ (3) and (6)), Appellants                       
                inadvertently state that claims 1, 3, 21, and 30-32 stand finally rejected                       
                under § 103(a) over Ryan (Br. 2, ¶ III, and 3 (heading “A” under                                 
                “Argument”)).  However, Appellants clearly state the correct claims on                           
                appeal and involved in the sole rejection on appeal (Br. 1, 3).                                  
                                                       2                                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013