The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEIJI ONO and SUSUMU MIYAZAKI
____________
Appeal 2007-0129
Application 09/810,225
Technology Center1700
____________
Decided: January 31, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1, 3, 4 and 15. Claims 6-14, which are the only other claims pending
in this application, stand withdrawn from further consideration by the
Examiner as drawn to a non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. An oral hearing was held on January 11, 2007.
Appellants’ invention is drawn to a method wherein ultraviolet ray –
excitable aluminate phosphor compounds are mixed with a coupling agent
comprising an aluminum compound. The resultant product of the mixing
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013