Ex Parte RE37,127 et al - Page 4

                Appeal 2007-0136                                                                              
                Application 90/006,222                                                                        
                including a quantity of sintered carbide pellets and a quantity of cast carbide               
                pellets".  The "at least 60% by weight" refers to the "granule", which                        
                "include[s]" quantities of sintered and cast carbide pellets.  The word                       
                "including" is an open-ended term in claim construction.9  Thus, while the                    
                composition must be 60% by weight granules, the granules themselves must                      
                include but are not limited to sintered and cast carbide pellets.                             
                      BHI defines "pellet" to mean—10                                                         
                      particles [sic] of carbide that are generally spherical in                              
                      configuration.  Pellets are not true spheres, but lack the corners,                     
                      sharp edges, and angular projections commonly found in                                  
                      crushed an other non-spherical carbide grains or particles.                             
                From this definition, one skilled in the art would have understood pellets to                 
                be generally spherical carbide particles.                                                     
                      BHI gives great weight to "spherical" as a limitation–to the point that                 
                the qualifying adverb "generally" is often ignored in the briefing.11  In claim               
                construction, "generally" in this context permits a some deviation from                       
                "spherical" consistent with the purpose of the invention.12  BHI's                            
                specification provides some insight into the degree of deviation permitted in                 


                                                                                                             
                9 Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1345,                           
                65 USPQ2d 1385, 1408 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (equating "including" with                              
                "comprising").                                                                                
                10 Spec. 3:32-37.                                                                             
                11 Br. 6-8; Reply 2-4.                                                                        
                12 Anchor Wall Sys., Inc. v. Rockwood Retaining Walls, Inc., 340 F.3d 1298,                   
                1311, 67 USPQ2d 1865, 1873-74 (Fed. Cir. 2003); accord Howmedica                              
                Osteonics Corp. v. Tranquil Prospects, Ltd., 401 F.3d 1367, 1373,                             
                74 USPQ2d 1680, 1686 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (relying on the described function                      
                to deviate from "uniform").                                                                   
                                                      4                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013