Ex Parte Kimura - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                        Exparte SHINYA KIMUR       A                                          
                                               ____________                                                   
                                           Appeal No. 2007-0144                                               
                                          Application 09/846,907                                              
                                          Technology Center 2100                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                           Decided: May 8, 2007                                               
                                               ____________                                                   
                Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, M            AHSHID D. SAADAT                                     
                and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           



                                      I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      A Paten t Examiner rejected claims 1 and 2.  The Appellant appeals                      
                therefrom under 35 U.S.C.  134(a).  We have jurisdiction under 35                            
                U.S.C.  6(b).                                                                                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013