Ex Parte Hatwar et al - Page 2

                Appeal  2007-0162                                                                            
                Application 10/690,940                                                                       
                      1.  A stabilized white-light-emitting OLED device, comprising:                         
                      a)  an anode;                                                                          
                      b)  a cathode;                                                                         
                      c)  at least two light-emitting layers disposed between the anode and                  
                the cathode; and                                                                             
                      d)  a stabilizing substituted perylene material having a concentration                 
                selected so that it does not emit light to thereby increase the lifetime of the              
                white-light-emitting OLED device.                                                            
                      The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of                       
                obviousness:                                                                                 
                Codama   US 6,091,196  Jul. 18, 2000                                                         
                Toguchi   US 6,753,097 B2  Jun. 22, 2004                                                     
                      Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a stabilized white-light-                 
                emitting OLED device comprising an anode, a cathode and at least two                         
                light-emitting layers disposed between the anode and cathode.  In addition,                  
                one of the layers of the device comprising a substituted perylene material                   
                having a concentration such that it does not emit light and thereby increases                
                the lifetime of the OLED device.                                                             
                      Appealed claims 1-4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                        
                paragraph, description requirement.  Claims 1, 5, 13, and 17-19 stand                        
                rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Codama.                         
                Claims 2-4, 6-8, and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                     
                unpatentable over Codama in view of Toguchi.                                                 
                      We have thoroughly reviewed the respective positions advanced by                       
                the Appellants and the Examiner.  In so doing, we will sustain the                           
                Examiner's rejection under § 112, first paragraph.  However, we agree with                   


                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013