Ex Parte Zen - Page 3

             Appeal No. 2007-0180                                                          Page 3              
             Application No. 10/663,843                                                                        

             45, 60-61.  Answer 4: 9-10.  These values overlap with the amounts recited in                     
             claim 1 of “(b) 2 to 15% by weight of at least one surfactant.”                                   
                   Preferred solvents are described by Schmitt as dibutyl phthalate and butyl                  
             benzoate.  Col. 3, ll. 9-12.  Example 1 describes the use of butyl benzoate as a                  
             solvent (col. 5, l. 35), which is a solvent recited in instant claim 5 (“wherein the              
             aromatic ester solvent (c) [of claim 1] is . . . butyl benzoate”).   The solvents can be          
             present in amounts of “more than 20% by weight,” which are overlapping with                       
             claim 1 (“(c) 15 to 90% by weight of at least one aromatic ester solvent”).                       
                   Schmitt’s composition can also contain an insecticide, preferably a                         
             phosphoric ester, carbamates, pyrethroid, or nitroimine.  Col. 4, ll. 22-48; col. 8, ll.          
             25, 30 (listing the pyrethroids cypermethrin and permethrin).  Answer 4: 2-3.                     
             The insecticide can be present in 0.001 to 10% by weight.  Col. 4, ll. 52-53.                     
             Answer 4: 3-4.  The amounts of insecticide in Schmitt’s composition overlap with                  
             the amounts which are recited in claim 1 (“(a) 1 to 60% by weight of a pyrethroid                 
             compound”).                                                                                       
                   The Examiner states that the difference between the claimed invention and                   
             Schmitt is that Schmitt does not “explicitly exemplify a combination of a                         
             pyrethroid, surfactant, and an aromatic solvent such as butyl benzoate” as required               
             by claim 1.  Answer 4: 16-18.  However, the Examiner asserts that butyl benzoate                  
             [an “aromatic ester solvent”] is described (col. 3, l. 12) as preferred.  Answer 4.               
             The Examiner states that use of a pyrethroid in Schmitt’s composition would have                  
             been obvious because Schmitt explicitly suggests the addition of other fungicides                 
             or insecticides “for the purpose of increasing the spectrum of action or to achieve               
             specific effects” and lists pyrethroids in its claimed composition (col. 8, ll. 8-30).            
             Answer 4-5; See also Schmitt, col. 3, ll. 27-32.                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013