Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Vu - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2007 > Ex Parte Vu - Page 1

                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
                                is not binding precedent of the Board                              
                                           ___________                                             
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                           ___________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                            
                                           ___________                                             
                                    Ex parte ANTHONY T. VU                                         
                                           ___________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-0204                                          
                                      Application 10/938,966                                       
                                      Technology Center 3700                                       
                                           ___________                                             
                                     Decided: 31 October 2007                                      
                                           ___________                                             
             Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and                                           
             JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
             BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                 

                                   DECISION ON REHEARING                                           
                   Appellant requests rehearing of that portion of our decision entered            
             January 31, 2007,1 wherein we affirmed a rejection of claims 51-54 for lack           
             of written description under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.  Appellant does        
             not request rehearing of that portion of our decision in which we affirmed a          
             rejection of claim 45 as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.          
                   The request for rehearing is granted-in-part.                                   
                                                                                                  
                   1  The date stamp on the opinion erroneously reads "January 31, 2006."          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007