Ex Parte Vu - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                          
                                               ___________                                                  
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ___________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               ___________                                                  
                                       Ex parte ANTHONY T. VU                                               
                                               ___________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-0204                                                
                                         Application 10/938,9661                                            
                                               ___________                                                  
                                                ON BRIEF                                                    
                                               ___________                                                  
               Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent                                  
               Judges.                                                                                      
               BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the final                   
               rejection of claims 51-54 and the objection to claim 45.                                     
                     We affirm.                                                                             



                                                                                                           
                     1  Application for patent filed September 10, 2004, entitled "Real-Time                
               Localization Monitoring, Triggering, and Acquisition of 3D MRI."                             



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013