The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte JENNIFER J. THAYER,
JEFFREY D. SCHWARTZ, and NEAL A. KRAWETZ
____________________
Appeal 2007-0210
Application 10/167,3591
Technology Center 2100
____________________
Decided: May 24, 2007
____________________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO,
and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.
LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF CASE
Appellants appeal from a final rejection of claims 1-20 and 26-49
under authority of 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). The Board of Patent Appeals
and Interferences (BPAI) has jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
1 Application filed June 11, 2002. The real party in interest is Hewlett
Packard Company.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013