The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
____________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOCHEN KAPPEL,
JOSEF MARKGRAF,
and MICHAEL MEADOWS
____________
Appeal 2007-0226
Application 09/823,8661
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: June 27, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and JAY P. LUCAS,
Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the final
rejection of claims 1-22. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm-in-part.
1 Application for patent filed March 31, 2001, entitled "Object to
Object Communication System and Method," now U.S. Pub.
2002/0052979 A1, published May 2, 2002.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013