Ex Parte Evans et al - Page 1

                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered                              
                                  today was not written for publication and                                   
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                 Ex parte PAT J. EVANS, JOHN G. PEARCE, and DUANE E. PEOPLES                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-0235                                                 
                                           Application 09/945,006                                             
                                             Technology Center                                                
                                           Decided: July 5, 2007                                              
                Before TERRY J. OWENS, HUBERT C. LORIN, and STUART S. LEVY,                                   
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 
                OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 1-17, 42, 43 and 45,                   
                which are all of the pending claims.                                                          
                                             THE INVENTION                                                    
                      The Appellants claim a footwear insole.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                       

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013