Ex Parte Simske - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                ___________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                ___________                                                   
                                       Ex parte STEVEN J. SIMSKE                                              
                                                ___________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0245                                                 
                                           Application 10/238,126                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                              
                                                ___________                                                   
                                         Decided: March 27, 2007                                              
                                                ___________                                                   

                    Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, JEAN R. HOMERE, and JAY P. LUCAS,                                 
                    Administrative Patent Judges.                                                             
                    DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner's                    
                final rejection of claims 1-6, 10-14, and 16-19.  Claims 7-9, 15, and 20 have                 
                been objected to and indicated as allowable if rewritten to include the                       
                intervening limitations (Answer 4).                                                           
                    We REVERSE.                                                                               




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013