onecle

Ex Parte Ku et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered                             
                                today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                Ex parte WILLIAM HSIAO-YU KU, JOHN SHIH-YUAN WANG,                                           
                           DEREK WAN HOK HO, and JOEY ALLEN PERRY                                            
                                               ____________                                                  

                                             Appeal 2007-0262                                                
                                          Application 09/925,258                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 30, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and                                          
                MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Final Rejection of                    
                claims 1-23.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                   
                      We affirm.                                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013