Ex Parte Gass et al - Page 7

            Appeal 2007-0266                                                                                  
            Application 09/929,227                                                                            

        1   rather than the knowledge possessed by one of ordinary skill in the art.  This is a               
        2   second reason why the Declaration does not establish that the Friemann reference                  
        3   is not an enabling disclosure.                                                                    
        4          Before turning to the obviousness rejection, we make one other point dealing               
        5   with the scope of the claimed subject matter. The Friemann reference discloses that               
        6   the saw blade can be stopped within 5 milliseconds or within 10 milliseconds.                     
        7   This is the time that it takes to stop the saw blade.  Appellants’ claims are directed            
        8   to the time it will take to move the brake component into engagement with the                     
        9   cutting tool.  The claims are silent with respect to stopping the blade.  Claim 31 is             
       10   even more distinguishable from the 5 milliseconds of Friemann in that in claim 31                 
       11   the actuator starts moving the component within 3 milliseconds.  Thus, as claimed,                
       12   it may indeed take an additional 2 milliseconds to stop the blade, if moving the                  
       13   brake started at 3 milliseconds.  The point is that Friemann completely stops the                 
       14   blade in 5 milliseconds, whereas, as claimed, Appellants only start the stopping                  
       15   process within 3 milliseconds.  Thus, the Examiner’s argument that the 3                          
       16   millisecond and 5 millisecond time periods are substantially similar is well taken.               
       17          Despite the foregoing, however, we reverse the rejections of the claims on                 
       18   appeal.  In our view, the Examiner has not cited any prior art that shows an                      
       19   actuator having stored energy sufficient to move the brake component to stop the                  
       20   saw band disclosed in Friemann.  We are in agreement with Dr. Turcic that it takes                
       21   substantial energy to stop the band brakes of Yoneda and Friemann.  Any                           
       22   capacitors in the circuitry of Yoneda and Friemann are merely electronic                          
       23   components and do not store energy to move the respective actuators.  With                        
       24   respect to Andreasson, we acknowledge that Andreasson uses a capacitor to                         
       25   energize the electromagnetic saw brake.  However, the amount of energy to stop a                  


                                                      7                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013