The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MEINHARD SCHWEFER, JOACHIM MOTZ,
and ROLF SIEFERT
____________
Appeal 2007-0280
Application 10/469,392
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: February 27, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and PETER F.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to
allow claims 14, 16 through 18, and 20 through 29, as amended subsequent
to the final rejection (see the amendment dated Feb. 1, 2006, entered as per
the Advisory Action dated Feb. 22, 2006; Br. 2; Answer 2, ¶ (4)). Claims
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013