onecle

Ex Parte Schwefer et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                          Ex parte MEINHARD SCHWEFER, JOACHIM MOTZ,                                            
                                            and ROLF SIEFERT                                                   
                                               ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-0280                                                 
                                           Application 10/469,392                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                         Decided: February 27, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                    

                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and PETER F.                                         
                KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to                   
                allow claims 14, 16 through 18, and 20 through 29, as amended subsequent                       
                to the final rejection (see the amendment dated Feb. 1, 2006, entered as per                   
                the Advisory Action dated Feb. 22, 2006; Br. 2; Answer 2,  (4)).  Claims                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013