The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte DANIEL J. SORENSEN
and ROBERT LEE POPP
______________
Appeal 2007-0283
Application 09/849,594
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: March 29, 2007
_______________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1, 3 through 10, 12 through 16, 18 through
29, 31, and 32, all of the claims in the Application, in the Office action
mailed October 12, 2004. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37
C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (September 2004).
We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013