The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DIRK SELDESLACHTS
________________
Appeal 2007-0295
Application 09/051,565
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: March 23, 2007
________________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 28, 32, 33, 36 through 40, 43 through 48, 50, 53, and 55
through 70, which are the only claims pending in this application (Br. 2;
Answer 2).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
1 Appellant states that an amendment dated Oct. 18, 2002, subsequent to the
Final Rejection, was not entered as noted in the Advisory Action dated
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013