The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DIANE B. HESS, CHARLES A. THOMAS,
CLIFTON A. PERRY, and RICHARD O. TUCKER
________________
Appeal 2007-0303
Application 10/348,101
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: August 21, 2007
________________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a) from the non-
final rejection of claims 1, 2, 5-7, and 19.
Representative claim 1 reads as follows:
1. A textile fabric comprising: a woven material of spun yarns
including first staple being a polymer selected from the group consisting of
aramid, PBI, PBO, or melamine formaldehyde, and a second staple of an
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013