Ex Parte Parks et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                __________                                                   
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                   
                                                  Ex parte                                                   
                             DAVID P. PARKS and JACKSON W. WEGELIN                                           
                                                __________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0305                                                
                                          Application 10/067,186                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                                      DECIDED: September 13, 2007                                            
                                                __________                                                   
                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and LORA M. GREEN,                                
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the final                      
                rejection of claims 1-3, 5-11, 13, 14, 16-45, 48, and 51-64.1  We have                       
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  We affirm.                                             

                                                                                                            
                1  Claims 4, 12, 15, 46, 47, 49, and 50 are also pending, but not the subject of             
                appeal.  The Examiner has not addressed the status of these claims in the                    
                Answer.                                                                                      



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013