Ex Parte Ehlers et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 __________                                                     
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                 __________                                                     
                          Ex parte STEPHAN EHLERS, KOLN, JOSE F. PAZOS,                                         
                 CHRISTIAN STEINLEIN, MICHAEL SCHNEIDER, JORG HOFMANN,                                          
                                 MAJID KEYVANI, and JOHN E. HAYES                                               
                                                 __________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-0310                                                  
                                           Application 10/260,498                                               
                                           Technology Center 1600                                               
                                                 __________                                                     
                                          Decided: April 30, 2007                                               
                                                 __________                                                     
                Before DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and ERIC GRIMES,                                      
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                   
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a process                    
                for preparing an ethylene oxide-capped polyol.  The Examiner has rejected                       
                the claims as obvious.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We                        
                affirm.                                                                                         






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013