The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARTHUR SHEIMAN, SAIMANOHORA ALAPATI,
WILLIAM TISO, and LOUIS FRANCZ
____________
Appeal 2007-0333
Application 09/966,802
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: February 27, 2007
____________
Before ALLEN R. MACDONALD, JEAN R. HOMERE, and
JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.
MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1, 7, 13, and 19-22. Claims 2, 4-6,
8, 10-12, 14, 16-18, 23-27, and 30-33 have been indicated as containing
allowable subject matter (Br. 2). We have jurisdiction over the appeal
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013