onecle

Ex Parte Sheiman et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                             ____________                                                 
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                             ____________                                                 
                     Ex parte ARTHUR SHEIMAN, SAIMANOHORA ALAPATI,                                        
                                 WILLIAM TISO, and LOUIS FRANCZ                                           
                                             ____________                                                 
                                           Appeal 2007-0333                                               
                                         Application 09/966,802                                           
                                        Technology Center 2100                                            
                                             ____________                                                 
                                       Decided: February 27, 2007                                         
                                             ____________                                                 

               Before ALLEN R. MACDONALD, JEAN R. HOMERE, and                                             
               JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
               MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                     This appeal involves claims 1, 7, 13, and 19-22.  Claims 2, 4-6,                     
               8, 10-12, 14, 16-18, 23-27, and 30-33 have been indicated as containing                    
               allowable subject matter (Br. 2).  We have jurisdiction over the appeal                    
               pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013