onecle

Ex Parte Georgiev - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                             ____________                                                 
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                             ____________                                                 
                                    Ex parte TODOR G. GEORGIEV                                            
                                             ____________                                                 
                                           Appeal 2007-0337                                               
                                         Application 09/996,200                                           
                                        Technology Center 2600                                            
                                             ____________                                                 
                                       Decided: February 22, 2007                                         
                                             ____________                                                 

               Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and JAY                                    
               P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
               MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                     This appeal involves claims 1-6, 10-21, and 25-39.  Claims 7-9 and                   
               22-24 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter (Br. 2;                   









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013