Ex Parte Galli - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-0338                                                                           
               Application 09/870,223                                                                     

                                           INTRODUCTION                                                   
                     The claims are directed to an interactive voice response system.                     
               Specifically, the system includes a database of pre-recorded voice prompts                 
               which are held outside the compiled code of an application program.  To                    
               retrieve a voice prompt from the database, the program provides a variable                 
               whose value specifies the entry point into the database.  The variable’s value             
               is assigned by an assignment table.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                              
                     1.  An interactive voice response system, comprising:                                
                     an application program that provides call flow instructions, wherein a               
               call flow instruction that invokes a voice prompt provides a variable that can             
               be read from outside compiled code of the application program;                             
                     a programmable processor that executes the call flow instructions of                 
               the application program;                                                                   
                     a database that contains a plurality of pre-recorded voice prompts; and              
                     an assignment table that assigns a value to the variable to provide an               
               entry point to the database.                                                               

                     The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference to show                     
               unpatentability:                                                                           
               Osder                     US 5,493,606             Feb. 20, 1996                           

                     The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                          
                  1. Claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                
                     anticipated by Osder.                                                                
                  2. Claims 3-8 and 11-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as                         
                     unpatentable over Osder.                                                             
                     Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the Examiner, we                    
               make reference to the Briefs and the Answer for their respective details.                  


                                                    2                                                     

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013