Ex Parte Levy-Abegnoli et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                       Ex parte ERIC LEVY-ABEGNOLI and PASCAL THUBERT                                         
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0351                                                 
                                          Application 09/963,737                                              
                                          Technology Center 2100                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided: March 9, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, and JEAN R.                                      
                HOMERE,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
                HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of                       
                claims 21 to 32.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                
                      Appellants have invented a method and apparatus for load balancing                      
                connections between a plurality of servers and a plurality of clients.  In                    




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013