The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte MAILVAGANAM MAHENDRAN,
KENNETH PAUL GOODBOY and LUIGI FABBRICINO
____________________
Appeal 2007-0365
Application 10/941,3511
Technology Center 1700
____________________
Oral Argument: None
Decided: 8 May 2007
____________________
Before: FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
CAROL A. SPIEGEL and MARK NAGUMO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 Application for patent filed 14 September 2004. The application
on appeal (1) is said to be a continuation of application 10/037,432, filed
04 January 2002 (now abandoned), which is turn (2a) is said to be a
continuation-in-part of application 09/335,073, filed 17 June 1999 (now U.S.
Patent 6,354,444) and (2b) a continuation-in-part of application 08/886,652,
filed 01 July 1997 (now U.S. Patent 5,914,039). See Specification, page 1,
¶ 0001.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013