1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte DINESH VENKATESH, XIAOYE JIANG,
12 JIANNAN ZHENG, and URESH VAHALIA
13 ____________________
14
15 Appeal 2007-0398
16 Application 10/308,445
17 Technology Center 2100
18 ____________________
19
20 Decided: April 6, 2007
21 ____________________
22
23 Before: JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and ALLEN R.
24 MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
25
26 MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.
27
28
29
30
31
32 DECISION ON APPEAL
33
34
35
36 REVERSED
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013