onecle

Ex Parte Shekunov et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                               
                        written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                              

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                 ________________                                                       
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                 ________________                                                       
                                         Ex parte BORIS Y. SHEKUNOV,                                                    
                                      PRATIBHASH CHATTOPADHYAY                                                          
                                          and JEFFREY S. SEITZINGER                                                     
                                                 ________________                                                       
                                                 Appeal 2007-0414                                                       
                                              Application 10/691,113                                                    
                                              Technology Center 1700                                                    
                                                 ________________                                                       
                                            Decided:  January 29, 2007                                                  
                                                 ________________                                                       
                 Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                           
                 CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                 KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-19 and 21-37.                            
                 Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                               
                        1.  A method of producing particles comprising the steps of:                                    
                        providing a supercritical fluid;                                                                


                                                                                                                       



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013