onecle

Ex Parte Kreulen et al - Page 1



              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for         
                          publication and is not binding precedent of the board                      

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                          _____________                                              
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          _____________                                              
                              Ex parte JEFFREY THOMAS KREULEN                                        
                                 and WILLIAM SCOTT SPANGLER                                          
           _____________                                                                             
                                        Appeal No. 2007-0429                                         
                                       Application 09/848,4301                                       
                                       Technology Center 2100                                        
                                          ______________                                             
                                        Decided: June 8, 2007                                        
                                         _______________                                             

           Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOHN C. MARTIN, and JAY P. LUCAS,                                 
           Administrative Patent Judges.                                                             
           MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
                 This is an appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10,        
           and 13-25 under 35 U.S.C.  103(a).2                                                      
                                                                                                    
                 1   Filed May 4, 2001.                                                              
                 2  At page 13 of the Answer, the Examiner withdrew the  103(a) rejection           
           of claims 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, and 12.  The appeal is therefore dismissed with respect to      
           those claims.                                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013