onecle

Ex Parte Gennetten et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                    
                                 is not binding precedent of the Board.                              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                           ____________                                              
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                           ____________                                              
                              Ex parte DOUGLAS K. GENNETTEN and                                      
                                        ANDREW C. GORIS                                              
                                           ____________                                              
                                         Appeal 2007-0434                                            
                                       Application 10/041,207                                        
                                       Technology Center 2100                                        
                                           ____________                                              
                                      Decided: August 14, 2007                                       
                                           ____________                                              

              Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and                                   
              JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                   I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                          
                    A Patent Examiner rejected claims 1 and 3-33.  The Appellants appeal             
              therefrom under 35 U.S.C.  134(a).  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.              
               6(b).                                                                                







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013