onecle

Ex Parte Bau et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                           ____________                                              
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                           ____________                                              
                  Ex parte DAVID BAU III, ADAM BOSWORTH, GARY S. BURD                                
                         RODERICK A. CHAVEZ, and KYLE W. MARVIN                                      
                                           ____________                                              
                                         Appeal 2007-0435                                            
                                       Application 10/082,794                                        
                                      Technology Center 2100                                         
                                           ____________                                              
                                      Decided: March 28, 2007                                        
                                           ____________                                              

              Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and                                 
              JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                              


                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                    This appeal involves claims 1-52, the only claims pending in this                
              application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b), 134(a).                    








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013