Appeal 2007-0439
Application 10/630260
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we conclude that
the Examiner erred in rejecting claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 2nd
paragraph.
Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we further conclude
that the examiner did not err in rejecting claims 1 to 5 and 9 to 12 under 35
U.S.C. § 102 (b). The Examiner did err in rejecting claims 6 and 8 under 35
U.S.C. § 102 (b). Claim 7 does not stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
DECISION
The Examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 2nd paragraph of
claim 11 is reversed.
The Examiner's rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) of claims 1 to 5
and 9 to 12 is affirmed. The rejection of claims 6 and 8 is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013