Ex Parte Triepels et al - Page 2

              Appeal 2007-0462                                                                       
              Application 09/519,547                                                                 

                                          BACKGROUND                                                 
                  Appellants’ invention relates to a display device having a conductor               
              pattern for connecting pixels in an electrically conducting manner (Spec.,             
              page 1, ll. 1-3).  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a             
              reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                               
                  1.   A display device comprising a first substrate having a                        
                  conductor pattern for connecting pixels in an electrically conducting              
                  manner, and electrically conducting connections between the pattern and            
                  conducting tracks on a support, at least one said conducting connection            
                  comprising a resilient connection pin which provides a variable-pressure           
                  metal-metal contact, in which each metal of the metal-metal contact is             
                  chosen from the group of gold, silver and nickel.                                  

                                            PRIOR ART                                                
                  The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in                  
              rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                     

              LAZZERY   US 4,012,117   Mar. 15, 1977                                                 
              LIGHTBODY  US 4,528,500   Jul. 9, 1985                                                 
              IGUCHI   US 5,233,451   Aug. 3, 1993                                                   
              HIRAMOTO  US 5,847,783   Dec. 8, 1998                                                  
                                           REJECTIONS                                                
                  Claims 1-3, 6, 8, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being              
              unpatentable over Lazzery in view of Lightbody.                                        
                  Claims 5 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being                        
              unpatentable over Lazzery in view of Lightbody as applied to claim 1 above,            
              and further in view of Hiramoto.                                                       



                                                 2                                                   

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013