onecle

Ex Parte Park et al - Page 1







                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ____________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                            
                                          ____________                                             
                       Ex parte CHANG-SOO PARK and HYEON-WOO LEE                                   
                                          ____________                                             
                                        Appeal 2007-0466                                           
                                      Application 10/209,114                                       
                                      Technology Center 2600                                       
                                          ____________                                             
                                     Decided: October 26, 2007                                     
                                          ____________                                             

              Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and                                  
              HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 

              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                            


                           DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                       
                                        INTRODUCTION                                               
                    Appellants’ Request for Rehearing (filed Jun. 1, 2007; Certificate of          
              Mailing dated May 30, 2007) contends that we erred in our Decision on                
              Appeal entered March 30, 2007 (“Decision”), in which we sustained the                
              rejection of claims 12-16 and 26-28.                                                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013