Ex Parte Seseke-Koyro et al - Page 1





                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                             _______________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                             _______________                                                 
                                   Ex parte ULRICH SESEKE-KOYRO,                                             
                              ANDREAS BECKER, and JOACHIM FREHSE                                             
                                             ______________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-0501                                                
                                          Application 10/747,956                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                             _______________                                                 
                                         Decided: Marc h 23, 2007                                            
                                             _______________                                                 
                Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                                  
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary                        
                Examiner finally rejecting claims 8 through 12 in the Office action mailed                   
                April 7, 2005.1  35 U.S.C.  6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R.  41.31(a)                      
                (2005).                                                                                      
                                                                                                            
                1  Claims 13 through 17, also of record, have been withdrawn from                            
                consideration by the Examiner under 37 C.F.R.  1.142(b).                                    
                                                     1                                                       

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013