The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ULRICH SESEKE-KOYRO,
ANDREAS BECKER, and JOACHIM FREHSE
______________
Appeal 2007-0501
Application 10/747,956
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: Marc h 23, 2007
_______________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 8 through 12 in the Office action mailed
April 7, 2005.1 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a)
(2005).
1 Claims 13 through 17, also of record, have been withdrawn from
consideration by the Examiner under 37 C.F.R. § 1.142(b).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013