Ex Parte Stockert et al - Page 3

           Appeal 2007-0543                                                                        
           Application 10/023,182                                                                  

                 According to Appellants, the cDNA encoding NY-ESO-1 was originally                
           isolated from a library prepared from a specimen of squamous cell cancer of the         
           esophagus (Specification 6: 4-8), and the corresponding mRNA was subsequently           
           detected in other esophageal  tumors, as well as tumors of unrelated lineage,           
           including melanoma, and breast (id. at 10: 24-26).  NY-ESO-1’s overall “pattern of      
           expression is consistent with other tumor rejection antigen precursors” (id. at 10:     
           13-14).  Moreover, NY-ESO-1 was “found to be reactive with antibodies in the            
           serum of cancer patients” (id. at 5: 12-13, 16-17).                                     
                 In order to evaluate T cell response to NY-ESO-1, the amino acid sequence         
           of the protein encoded by SEQ ID NO: 1 was analyzed, and peptides satisfying the        
           binding motif for the MHC molecule HLA-A2 were tested in cytotoxicity assays            
           (id. at 17: 9-11 and 24: 4-11).  Of these peptides, three corresponding to SEQ ID       
           NOS: 4, 5, and 6, with the common amino acid sequence SLLMWIT, “were the                
           three best stimulators of CTLs” (id. at 25: 1-4).  In addition, the deduced protein     
           was analyzed for peptides satisfying other MHC binding motifs (i.e., various            
           HLA-A and HLA-B molecules).  Of the thirty-eight such peptides listed in the            
           specification, only a few have sequences overlapping SEQ ID NOS: 3, 4, and 5            
           (id. at 25: 9 to 26: 40).  According to Appellants, complexes between these             
           additional peptides and their corresponding MHC molecules “should provoke a             
           cytolytic T cell response” (id. at 25: 12-15), which “could be determined by one        
           skilled in the art following [conventional] methods” (id. at 25: 16-17).                
                 According to the Examiner, however, “[t]he specification does not provide         
           an adequate written description of the claimed genus” (Answer 10), because the          
           peptides corresponding to SEQ ID NOS: 3, 4, and 5 are not representative of a           
           genus that encompasses “peptides [which] do not have to share the same common           
           structure SLLMWIT of . . . SEQ ID NO[S]: 4, 5 and 6” (Answer 5).  As far as the         

                                                3                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013