1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte ROBERT L. KOELZER
12 ___________________
13
14 Appeal 2007-0605
15 Application 10/231,7711
16 Technology Center 3700
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: April 25, 2007
20 _________________
21
22 Before: ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and
23 STUART S. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30 STATEMENT OF CASE
31 Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection
32 of claims 1 to 20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
33 An Oral Hearing was conducted on April 5, 2007.
1 Application filed August 30, 2002. The real party in interest is Haldex
Brake Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013