The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HENRICUS ANTONIUS WILHELMUS VAN GESTEL, and
NATHALIE DOROTHEE PIETERNEL LEURS
____________
Appeal 2007-0608
Application 09/738,647
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: April 17, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and
JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 1, 3 through 6 and 8 through 16. We have jurisdiction
under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013