1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte PATRICK THOMAS O'CONNOR and DONALD REX BOYS
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2007-0609
15 Application 09/814,0101
16 Technology Center 3600
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: February 28, 2007
20 ____________________
21
22 Before: HUBERT C. LORIN, STUART S. LEVY, and ROBERT E.
23 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
29
30 STATEMENT OF CASE
31 Applicants appeal from a final rejection of claims 35 and 36 under 35
32 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
1 Application filed March 20, 2001. Applicants claim the benefit under
35 U.S.C. § 120 of application 09/323,599, filed June 1, 1999. The real
party in interest is Patrick Thomas O’Connor and Donald Rex Boys.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013