The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WALTER FISCHER, KATHARINA FRITZSCHE,
WALTER WOLF, and LOTHAR BORE
__________
Appeal No. 2007-0623
Application No. 10/380,591
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before SCHEINER, ADAMS and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-11, which are all the claims pending in this
application.
Claim 11 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced in
the appendix of this opinion.
The references relied upon by the Examiner are:
Burgess et al. (Burgess) 3,244,667 Apr. 5, 1966
Hartmann et al. (Hartmann), “A simple route to 2H-Naphtho[1,2-c]1,2,3-
Triazoles,” Journal f. prakt. Chemie, Vol. 332, No. 3, pp. 331-335 (1990).
1 Claims 2-11 depend from claim 1.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013