Ex Parte Owlett - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-0644                                                                            
               Application 10/081,500                                                                      

                                            INTRODUCTION                                                   
                      The claims relate to a method and system for authentication of a user                
               by an authenticating entity.  The authenticating entity sends a challenge (e.g,             
               a bit sequence) to the user, to which the user adds a spoiler (e.g., an                     
               additional bit sequence).  The user encrypts the combined spoiler and                       
               challenge using a private key of an asymmetric key pair.  Claim 1 is                        
               illustrative:                                                                               
                      1.  A method for authentication of a user by an authenticating entity                
               comprising the steps of:                                                                    
                      the authenticating entity sending a challenge to the user;                           
                      the user adding a spoiler to the challenge;                                          
                      the user encrypting the combined spoiler and challenge using a private               
               key of an asymmetric key pair;                                                              
                      the user sending a response to the authenticating entity in the form of              
               the encrypted combined spoiler and challenge.                                               
                                                                                                          
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                    
               unpatentability:                                                                            
               Tsudik                             US 6,072,875                           Jun. 6, 2000      
               Andersson                       US 2002/0034301 A1       Mar. 21, 2002                      
               Hara                                US 2004/0202328 A1     Oct. 14, 2004                      
                      The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                          
                  1. Claims 1-5 and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                         
                      unpatentable over Andersson and Hara.                                                
                  2. Claims 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as unpatentable                      
                      over Andersson, Hara, and Tsudik.                                                    

                                                    2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013