onecle

Ex Parte Johnson - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                         
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                       
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                  ____________                                                       
                                    Ex parte CAROLYNN RAE JOHNSON                                                    
                                                  ____________                                                       
                                                Appeal 2007-0660                                                     
                                             Application 10/116,574                                                  
                                             Technology Center 2100                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                       
                                             Decided: April 30, 2007                                                 
                                                  ____________                                                       

                 Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, LANCE LEONARD BARRY,                                                     
                 and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
                 HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                                         STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                       
                        Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner’s final                            
                 rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 11 through 13.  Claims 2, 5, 8, 10, 14,                   
                 and 15 have been cancelled.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b) to                         
                 decide this appeal.                                                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013