Ex Parte Lagler - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                            
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                          ____________________                                                 
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                          ____________________                                                 
                                         Ex parte LOUIS LAGLER                                                 
                                          ____________________                                                 
                                              Appeal 2007-0672                                                 
                                           Application 10/399,702                                              
                                          Technology Center 3700                                               
                                          ____________________                                                 
                                           Decided: June 29, 2007                                              
                                          ____________________                                                 
                Before: WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS and MURRIEL E.                                    
                CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
                CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   

                                          STATEMENT OF CASE                                                    
                      Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection                    
                of claims 11 to 35.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).                       
                      Appellant invented a closure having a closure body made of a first                       
                plastic material and a sealing element having a deformable collar made of a                    
                second flexible plastic material (Specification 1).                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013