Ex Parte Akasaka - Page 1




         1   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
         2          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.       
         3                                                                          
         4                                                                           
         5        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                          
         6                          _____________                                    
         7                                                                           
         8             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
         9                      AND INTERFERENCES                                    
        10                          _____________                                    
        11                                                                           
        12                   Ex parte YOUICHI AKASAKA                                
        13                          _____________                                    
        14                                                                           
        15                         Appeal 2007-0680                                  
        16                       Application 10/655,901                              
        17                      Technology Center 3600                               
        18                         ______________                                    
        19                                                                           
        20                      Decided:  March 29, 2007                             
        21                         _______________                                   
        22                                                                           
        23  Before ROBERT E. NAPPI, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W.                    
        24  FETTING Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
        25                                                                           
        26  NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      
        27                                                                          
        28                                                                           
        29                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
        30                                                                           
        31       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) of the final    
        32  rejection of claims 1, 4 through 11 and 14 through 20.  For the reasons stated
        33  infra we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.      
        34                                                                           
        35                                                                           
        36                           INVENTION                                       
        37                                                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013