The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THORSTEN SCHULZE, FRANZ STEIMMEL,
MICHAEL OPITZ, and FRANK WAHNER
____________
Appeal 2007-0689
Application 10/329,825
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: April 23, 2007
____________
Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and
STUART S. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Thorsten Schulze et al. (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 9 and 11-15, the only pending
claims. We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013