Ex Parte Nelson et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                  

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ____________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          ____________                                             
                          Ex parte JAMES R. NELSON, JAMES P. TERRY,                                
                                    and JAMES R. SMITHERS                                          
                                          ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-0690                                          
                                      Application 10/224,917                                       
                                     Technology Center 2100                                        
                                          ____________                                             
                                      Decided: June 26, 2007                                       
                                          ____________                                             

              Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOHN C. MARTIN,                                              
              and JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
              THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                 


                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    This appeal involves claims 1 through 5 and 8 through 24, Appellants           
              having canceled claims 6 and 7.  We have Jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                
               6(b) and 134(a).                                                                  







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013