Appeal 2007-0700
Application 09/159,509
Patent 5,559,995
12. After entry of the First Amendment, the application claims
were 1-9.
13. In the First Amendment, Appellants presented arguments with
respect to the patentability of amended claims 1, 7, and 8.
14. Appellants’ amendments and/or arguments (see below)
addressed at least the following limitations of Appellants’ amended claim 1:
(1) pictorial representation of objects in the virtual world;
(2) at least one of wireframe objects and polygon objects; and
(3) at least one of wireframe and polygon-based [virtual world];
Limitations (1) and (2) were added to claims 1 and 7 by the First
Amendment.
Limitation (3) was added to the “virtual world” found in original
claim 8.
15. In the First Amendment at page 6, last three lines, Appellants
argued the following:
[Wexelblat’s information handling] differs greatly from
“a pictorial representation of objects in the virtual world”
which are grouped into “at least one of wireframe objects
and polygon objects”.
The argument directly above addressed Finding of Fact 14 limitations (1)
and (2) found in Appellants’ amended claims 1 and 7.
- 8 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013