1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
2 not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte JAMES R. PARKS, BRIAN P. WATTENBACH,
13 and
14 STEVEN A. SHULL
15 _____________
16
17 Appeal No. 2007-0703
18 Application No. 11/044,945
19 Technology Center 3700
20 ______________
21
22 Decided: September 26, 2007
23 _______________
24
24 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and JENNIFER D. BAHR,
25
25 Administrative Patent Judges.
26
27
27 PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.
28
29
30
31 DECISION ON APPEAL
32
33
34 STATEMENT OF THE CASE
35
36 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-13. These are the only
37 claims in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 6(a).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013