Ex Parte 6202052 et al - Page 2



                Appeal 2007-0712                                                                              
                Application 90/006,713                                                                        
                appeal is:                                                                                    
                      Scott Beamer, A Marriage of Convenience. (MacInTax, MacMoney,                           
                and Dollars & Sense for tax preparation and planning), MacUser, v3, n3,                       
                p102(4) (March 1987).                                                                         
                      It’s W-2 Time – But This Year There’s a Better Way to Do your Taxes,                    
                PR Newswire, (February 1987).                                                                 
                      Laura Lou Meadows, Faster refunds with electronic filing:                               
                computerizing your relationship with the IRS, PC Magazine, v9, n4, p388(2)                    
                (February 1990).                                                                              
                      Electronic tax payment through TAXLINK discussed in IRS                                 
                procedure, standard Federal Tax Reports, Taxes on Parade, v80, n25, p4                        
                (June 1993).                                                                                  
                      Claims 29-36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as                  
                failing to comply with the written description requirement.                                   
                      Claims 29-36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph,                    
                as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim                
                the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention.                                  
                      Claims 1, 2, 6, 8-10, 14, 15, 17-20 and 29-36 stand rejected under 35                   
                U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Beamer as further supported by “It’s                  
                W-2 Time.”                                                                                    
                      Claims 3-5, 7 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                   
                unpatentable over Beamer and further in view of “It’s W-2 Time.”                              
                      Claims 11-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                           
                unpatentable over Beamer, “It’s W-2 Time”, Meadows and “Electronic Tax                        
                                                      2                                                       



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013